Landscape / Foundations
verifiedSaddle Point
The old worry about non-convex optimisation was getting stuck in a bad local minimum. In high dimensions that worry was misplaced: almost every critical point is a saddle, curving down in some directions and up in others, because a point is a minimum only if all million directions curve up at once.
Saddles slow training rather than stopping it — gradients are small near one and the escape direction exists but is weak — which is a large part of why momentum helps and why plateaus appear in loss curves. This is also why local minima are rarely the explanation for a stalled run, and why looking for one is usually the wrong diagnosis.
At a critical point the Hessian's eigenvalue signs decide the type, and a minimum requires all d to be positive. If signs were independent with probability p of being positive, minima would have probability p super d — vanishing in d — and the loss at the rare true minima concentrates near the global value, which is the second half of the result.
descending-directions holds 13% of the budget; rest holds the remaining 87%.
Directions curving downward at a critical point against directions curving up, in dimensions. Drag the descending directions up to watch it stop being a minimum — one is enough, which is why minima are rare and saddles are not.
Reviewed by opendroid · 2026-08-18
- arXiv:1406.2572 — Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimization